Files
knowledge-wiki/channels/1548051220533481536.md
T

57 lines
5.9 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
# Channel Wiki: #cogarch-v1-argo-workflows
_Channel ID: 1548051220533481536_
_Created: 2026-09-11 UTC_
_Last sync: 2026-09-16 03:11 UTC_
## Purpose
Observe, analyze, and preserve evidence about Cognitive Architect Solution Factory behavior and workflows. Observation is read-only by default.
## Canonical Resources
- Channel workspace: `/opt/data/cogarch-v1-argo-workflows/`
- Channel skill repository: https://gitea.lego-cloud.eu/cognitive-architect-v1-skills-code-agent/cogarch-v1-channel-argo-workflows
- IBM documentation repository, when relevant: `CTOTools/Documentation` on `github.ibm.com`
## Key Decisions
- Channel-owned files belong in the dedicated local workspace.
- Reusable operating rules belong in the dedicated channel skill; mutable continuity belongs in this wiki.
- Observation does not authorize upstream edits, external publication, or IBM merges. IBM merges require human approval.
- **Hard authority boundary:** Hermes must perform no write action against Cognitive Architect Argo Workflows in any environment unless Discord user `1518725627845283888` explicitly overrides this restriction.
- Production Argo Workflows access is read-only through the dedicated channel-skill helper. Its API token must never enter model context, command arguments, logs, or artifacts.
## Active Topics
- Investigate production Solution Factory workflow-template behavior and failures through GET-only Argo access.
## Key Context
- Use live source inspection for current-state claims.
- Load `cognitive-architect` for architecture/model work and `cogarch-github` for IBM CTOTools Documentation operations.
- The channel skill retrieves the Argo API token and Swagger URL by exact Bitwarden IDs inside a subprocess, permits only Swagger-declared GET operations, and sanitizes generic output.
- Live verification on 2026-09-11 identified Argo Workflows `v4.0.5` and service-account namespace `solution-factory`.
- The production namespace exposes six namespaced WorkflowTemplates: one four-phase coordinator, four generation/refinement phases, and a separate propagation phase. No CronWorkflows were listed; cluster-scoped template inventory is inaccessible to the read-only service account, so its existence is unknown.
- For architecture `arch_up7BoYhj-` and iteration `iter_QfJ3shQvZ`, no Workflow object exists in the live or archived lists. An Argo GET label selector using that architecture ID returns HTTP 400 because Kubernetes label values cannot end with `-`; normal Solution Factory submissions copy `architecture-id` into Workflow metadata labels. This is strong evidence that submission is rejected before the Processing workflow is created, not that a Processing pod starts and fails.
- Live inspection on 2026-09-13 found no active or archived Workflow labeled `architecture-id=arch_kiSj9jBKI`; the daily inventory also contained no record for it from 2026-09-06 through 2026-09-13. The current Processing template does include the intended image path: conversion-to-markdown → markdown-chunking → describe-images → merge-descriptions. Processing Workflows have `ttlStrategy.secondsAfterCompletion: 86400`, while the accessible archived list is empty, so Argo logs disappear with the Workflow after roughly 24 hours unless retained elsewhere. For a recent iteration, absence strongly suggests that the Processing Workflow was never created; for an older iteration, Argo alone cannot distinguish non-submission from TTL cleanup.
- Live inspection on 2026-09-15 for architecture `arch_xOQ5jks0b`, iteration `iter_fMfOM35fb`, found Processing succeeded (`phase-0100-processing-sn74b`, 6/6) but High-Level Insights failed (`phase-0200-high-level-insights-ffmgf`, 1/2). The first high-level step, `0200-phase-0600-step-generate-knowledge-wiki-plan`, launched the Cline/code agent but it exited with code 201 on the initial attempt and all three error retries. The original centralized agent log reportedly showed an operation timeout and retry-limit failure, but a rerun at 2026-09-15 12:02:57 UTC overwrote that file. A Redis DNS warning (`redis:6379` unresolved) appeared only in the failed run's Argo `main`-container stdout, was handled fail-open, and was not causal. Fresh read-only inspection of rerun pod `phase-0200-high-level-insights-9p7vz-run-step-2817085442` found 17 log entries, zero Redis references/errors, and normal one-key credential-pool initialization.
## People & Roles
- RootAtSkic (`1518725627845283888`) — channel owner and human authority.
- `whyt6249` (`204689314796273674`) — supplied the overwritten agent-log finding and identified the rerun pod for comparison.
- Hermes (`1526860732917088266`) — assisting bot.
## Action Items
- Select the first Solution Factory behavior or workflow to observe.
- ✅ The requested standalone HTML investigation page was delivered in Discord messages `1548064910263586922`–`1548064913602379868`.
- Obtain the exact `iter_...` ID and approximate start time for `arch_kiSj9jBKI` to determine whether it should remain inside Argo's 24-hour retention window and to correlate any external S3 or Solution Factory history.
## Evidence
- `1548051382714507325` — RootAtSkic requested a local folder, dedicated channel skill, and Gitea publication.
- Previous processed human message: `1548759488570466527` (2026-09-13 18:17 UTC; RootAtSkic confirmed that the lookup must use the exact Kubernetes selector `architecture-id=arch_kiSj9jBKI`; live and archived Argo queries using that selector returned no items).
- `1549364076239397005` — RootAtSkic requested diagnosis of failed High-Level Insights for `arch_xOQ5jks0b` / `iter_fMfOM35fb`; read-only Argo inspection isolated the failure to knowledge-wiki-plan agent exit code 201 after retries.
- Latest processed human message: `1549399634302992447` (2026-09-15 12:40 UTC; `whyt6249` requested comparison against rerun pod `phase-0200-high-level-insights-9p7vz-run-step-2817085442`; live read-only inspection found no recurrence of the Redis warning).