research: reconstruct Eldorado organization with sourced roles and explicit assumptions

research/organization/README.md

@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+# Organization research — 2026-10-02
+
+Public-evidence reconstruction, not an approved internal org chart. The canonical reader-facing report is `docs/organization/structure.mdx`. `sources.json` preserves retrieved URLs, access dates and verbatim excerpts checked against fetched page text with the grounded-citations evidence matcher. No private employee data or application forms were accessed.
+
+E = publicly evidenced names/categories/functions; J = job-advertised roles and reporting lines, not proof of occupancy; A = planning assumptions. The diagrams carry the same distinction. Department placement beneath Management is a model, not a proven reporting chain. Legal entities and hiring categories must not be conflated with departments.
+
+Coverage: official About, careers index and selected job detail pages plus legal Terms. The jobs index was not treated as an exhaustive personnel roster. Search-engine discovery was unhelpful (Google traffic challenge; Bing irrelevant results); all factual findings rely on directly fetched official sources. Exact headcount and unnamed incumbents are deliberately omitted. Current-role dates are access dates, not proof of appointment dates.
+
+Update source excerpts and access dates, revise the report and both diagrams together, then run `pnpm verify`, `pnpm typecheck`, `pnpm build`, `pnpm verify:build` and browser checks before publication. Revalidate recruitment evidence rather than treating an old vacancy as a permanent org fact.