feat: route product scope to Scope channel
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: corp-v1-channel-general
|
||||
description: "Use when operating or synchronizing a Corp v1 project's general channel. Correlates verified activity across the project's general, architecture, kanban, delivery, and releases channels; reports overall status, surfaces issues, proposes improvements, and maintains current project-level guidance."
|
||||
version: 1.4.0
|
||||
description: "Use when operating or synchronizing a Corp v1 project's general channel. Correlates verified activity across the project's general, scope, architecture, kanban, delivery, and releases channels; reports overall status, surfaces issues, and maintains project-level guidance."
|
||||
version: 1.5.0
|
||||
author: Hermes Agent
|
||||
license: MIT
|
||||
metadata:
|
||||
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ metadata:
|
||||
|
||||
## Overview
|
||||
|
||||
This skill owns project-level awareness and coordination for a Corp v1 project's `general` channel. It monitors the complete same-project channel set—`general`, `architecture`, `kanban`, `delivery`, and `releases`—and turns verified activity into concise overall updates, issue visibility, maintained guidance, and a durable project-documentation backlog of proposed Epics and Features.
|
||||
This skill owns project-level awareness and coordination for a Corp v1 project's `general` channel. It monitors the complete same-project channel set—`general`, `scope`, `architecture`, `kanban`, `delivery`, and `releases`—and turns verified activity into concise overall updates, issue visibility, and maintained guidance. Scope owns the authoritative Roadmap, Ideas, Epics, and Features; General may propose improvements and routes them to Scope instead of duplicating records.
|
||||
|
||||
It is not a replacement for architecture, delivery, or release ownership. It connects those workstreams, makes their implications visible to the whole project, and routes specialized work to the corresponding channel.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -35,17 +35,18 @@ Do not use it to approve architecture decisions, merge or release code, deploy,
|
||||
|
||||
## Approved Information Boundary
|
||||
|
||||
Read only the five channels belonging to the same project:
|
||||
Read only the six channels belonging to the same project:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
corp-v1-<code>-general
|
||||
corp-v1-<code>-scope
|
||||
corp-v1-<code>-architecture
|
||||
corp-v1-<code>-kanban
|
||||
corp-v1-<code>-delivery
|
||||
corp-v1-<code>-releases
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Read enough mapped-channel history to avoid duplicate updates and only new relevant messages from the other four channels since the previous useful synchronization. Never correlate another project's channels.
|
||||
Read enough mapped-channel history to avoid duplicate updates and only new relevant messages from the other five channels since the previous useful synchronization. Never correlate another project's channels.
|
||||
|
||||
## Core Responsibilities
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -188,8 +189,8 @@ General preserves authoritative Epic/Feature identity and Scope lifecycle eviden
|
||||
|
||||
## Synchronization Workflow
|
||||
|
||||
1. Confirm the exact project code and five approved channel IDs.
|
||||
2. Read new messages from the other four channels and enough `general` history to avoid duplicates.
|
||||
1. Confirm the exact project code and six approved channel IDs.
|
||||
2. Read new messages from the other five channels and enough `general` history to avoid duplicates.
|
||||
3. Separate facts, approved decisions, proposals, unresolved questions, and failed work.
|
||||
4. Correlate impact across architecture, Kanban, delivery, and releases.
|
||||
5. Inspect Scope navigation, Roadmap, Epics, Features, Ideas, task links, and lifecycle status.
|
||||
@@ -237,7 +238,7 @@ For completed work include exact evidence such as Discord message IDs, repositor
|
||||
|
||||
## Verification Checklist
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Only the five same-project channels were inspected.
|
||||
- [ ] Only the six same-project channels were inspected.
|
||||
- [ ] The update is new, substantive, and deduplicated.
|
||||
- [ ] Overall status, issues, and cross-channel implications are accurate.
|
||||
- [ ] Proposals are clearly labeled and routed.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user