# Generated evidence registries in Docusaurus Use this pattern when a canonical Markdown corpus must also expose a cross-client registry such as systems, products, suppliers, or services. ## Preserve the canonical layer - Keep client/source Markdown and its validator authoritative. - Generate ignored MDX copies and registry pages at build time. - Never edit generated pages to improve evidence; improve canonical table rows and regenerate. - Emit a machine-readable registry JSON alongside human-readable pages. ## Conservative identity model 1. Parse only the canonical, schema-defined table under the expected heading. 2. Preserve every source observation with client ID, client route, relationship, meaning/context, contractor, evidence, and confidence. 3. Normalize case, whitespace, dashes, and Markdown decoration for matching only; preserve observed labels for display. 4. Maintain explicit reviewed alias rules in durable source data. Merge only unmistakable product/shared-service identities. 5. Keep composite labels separate unless evidence proves their components and relationships. 6. Scope generic labels such as “official website”, “institution portal”, or “virtual exhibition” to the client; identical wording across clients does not prove one shared system. 7. Use stable hash-derived registry IDs/slugs so later insertions do not renumber established records. ## Docusaurus integration - Use a separate `@docusaurus/plugin-content-docs` instance with its own `id`, generated path, route base, and sidebar file. - Include every docs-plugin route base in local-search configuration. - A flat sidebar can be produced by generating all docs into one directory and using `{type: 'autogenerated', dirName: '.'}`; range directories create folder categories. - Keep existing client slugs explicit when changing generated-directory layout. - Validate source rows, unique records, generated routes, observation totals, representative pages, JSON output, and search-index terms after the real production build. ## Deployment verification behind authentication A successful Actions run is not sufficient. First prove `HEAD == origin/main` and that the run's `head_sha` matches. Then verify deployment. For an authentication-protected Pages ingress: - unauthenticated public `302` to the configured OAuth start path is expected, not a publish failure; - do not weaken or bypass authentication for users; - verify content through an authorized browser session or the internal static-site service/backend when operational access permits it; - check the homepage, one canonical dossier, registry index, one generated registry dossier, machine-readable JSON, and search index; - distinguish ingress/authentication changes from static publication failures before rolling back application code.