feat: require complete architecture task breakdowns
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: corp-v1-channel-architecture
|
||||
description: "Use when operating or synchronizing a Corp v1 project's architecture channel. Maintains C4-based architecture documentation, Draw.io diagrams, architecture decisions, and requirements while correlating verified activity across the project's seven channels."
|
||||
version: 1.6.2
|
||||
version: 1.7.0
|
||||
author: Hermes Agent
|
||||
license: MIT
|
||||
metadata:
|
||||
@@ -202,6 +202,17 @@ Use stable IDs such as `FR-0001` and `NFR-0001`. Requirements must be unambiguou
|
||||
|
||||
Architecture derives and maintains implementation-task semantics, dependencies, sequencing, and readiness from the FR/NFR solution. Scope hosts the canonical task records and reader pages under their owning Feature; Architecture must not create a competing task registry page or task navigation.
|
||||
|
||||
Architecture owns complete Task decomposition for every Feature allocated to the release. Before reporting a release planning-ready, Architecture must:
|
||||
|
||||
1. review existing Tasks and retain, revise, or supersede them according to the current Feature outcomes and Architecture boundaries;
|
||||
2. define at least two independently executable Tasks per Feature unless a recorded Architecture rationale proves that one atomic Task is the smallest verifiable boundary;
|
||||
3. map the Feature's Tasks collectively to every acceptance outcome and every applicable requirement, with reciprocal canonical traceability;
|
||||
4. encode within-Feature sequencing and every cross-Feature prerequisite as acyclic Task dependencies;
|
||||
5. give each Task one specific outcome, bounded scope, repository/component owner, future acceptance-evidence requirement, and canonical/display identity;
|
||||
6. keep draft Tasks separate from implementation approval and Kanban Focus admission.
|
||||
|
||||
Architecture must not report planning readiness while any Feature allocated to the release lacks this complete Task breakdown. A Feature-shaped placeholder Task, a generated empty Task group, or requirement coverage without executable Tasks does not satisfy the gate.
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
canonical_id | display_id | feature | outcome | scope | dependencies | owner | status | acceptance evidence | affected repository/component
|
||||
```
|
||||
@@ -291,6 +302,7 @@ Requires team approval for:
|
||||
- [ ] ADR, FR, and NFR entries have stable IDs and traceability.
|
||||
- [ ] Every solution Feature has explicit human `Approved for Solution` evidence.
|
||||
- [ ] Eligible Features have dependency-aware task derivation and version proposals, with canonical task reader pages under their Scope Feature.
|
||||
- [ ] Every Feature allocated to the planned release has a reviewed, non-placeholder Task breakdown covering every acceptance outcome and applicable requirement, with acyclic within-Feature and cross-Feature dependencies.
|
||||
- [ ] Task display IDs use `<UPPERCASE_PROJECT_CODE>-TS-<NUMBER>` without rewriting historic canonical identities, evidence, or append-only hashes.
|
||||
- [ ] Only a human team member moved a Feature to `Approved for Implementation` or finalized its version.
|
||||
- [ ] Tasks were proposed to Kanban with readiness/dependency evidence; Architecture did not self-admit them to Focus `InBacklog`.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user