documentation/research/ai-adoption/assignment-evidence.json

{
  "source": {
    "file": "AI_Architect_Test_Task.pdf",
    "sha256": "12b2406766996056d0a361cf76b2d8fbe4dfdfad6a16c2cc4d5ee03a51a384a5",
    "attachment_message": "1557767519748759646",
    "authorization_message": "1557786954383368264",
    "read_scope": "Full PDF, Format, Context and all four assignment questions, plus assumptions instruction"
  },
  "requirements": [
    {
      "id": "format",
      "source_section": "Format",
      "requirement": "Live presentation: 50 minutes including Q&A; content over polish",
      "pages": [
        "six-months-target"
      ],
      "markers": [
        "35 minutes content + 15 minutes Q&A",
        "Content matters more than visual polish"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "context",
      "source_section": "Context",
      "requirement": "Close to 80 engineering people, around 100 by year end, more than 10 teams; every developer already uses AI unevenly; real output not usage",
      "pages": [
        "six-months-target",
        "baseline"
      ],
      "markers": [
        "80 engineers",
        "100 by year end",
        "more than 10 teams",
        "current AI-assisted practice"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "q1",
      "source_section": "Assignment 1",
      "requirement": "Month 1–6 concrete priorities and change starting solo, CTO reporting, no formal team authority",
      "pages": [
        "six-months-roadmap",
        "six-months-target"
      ],
      "markers": [
        "Month 1",
        "Month 2",
        "Month 3",
        "Month 4",
        "Month 5",
        "Month 6",
        "One active live pilot at a time",
        "no formal authority",
        "monthly CTO review"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "q2",
      "source_section": "Assignment 2",
      "requirement": "Know whether engineering output improves; track meaningful measures and explain misleading signals",
      "pages": [
        "measurement/index",
        "six-months-roadmap",
        "baseline"
      ],
      "markers": [
        "Review/rework minutes",
        "Escaped defects and severity",
        "Where this misleads",
        "task mix",
        "not a causal ROI claim",
        "source",
        "uncertainty"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "q3",
      "source_section": "Assignment 3",
      "requirement": "Realistic visible month-six changes backed by evidence",
      "pages": [
        "six-months-target",
        "six-months-roadmap"
      ],
      "markers": [
        "Activities I commit",
        "Contingent visible outcome",
        "one partner team",
        "matured defect follow-up",
        "documented stop"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "q4",
      "source_section": "Assignment 4",
      "requirement": "Role and organization AI use beyond six months",
      "pages": [
        "stage-02-autonomous-agent",
        "six-months-target"
      ],
      "markers": [
        "dedicated enablement capacity",
        "deterministic tooling",
        "long-term strategy vision",
        "not automatic progression"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "assumptions",
      "source_section": "Final instruction",
      "requirement": "State assumptions where stack, tooling or processes are unknown",
      "pages": [
        "six-months-target"
      ],
      "markers": [
        "Assumptions register",
        "PDF fact",
        "Unknown:",
        "Hypothesis:",
        "If false"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "F1",
      "source_section": "Professional audit F1",
      "requirement": "First-revision comparator and recovery without invented prior approved bundle",
      "pages": [
        "skills-quality",
        "skills-governance",
        "skills-maintenance"
      ],
      "markers": [
        "first-revision",
        "N/A",
        "pinned clean",
        "independent"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "F2-F3",
      "source_section": "Professional audit F2/F3",
      "requirement": "Coherent illustrative packet, inconclusive bounded extension/stop, effort and value",
      "pages": [
        "six-months-roadmap",
        "skills-quality"
      ],
      "markers": [
        "EXP-01",
        "Entirely fictional",
        "Inconclusive at first review",
        "one two-week evidence-completion extension",
        "Conclusive stop on burden",
        "one-off setup",
        "optional reference designs"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "verification_sources": [
    "scripts/assignment.test.mjs",
    "scripts/connected-strategy.test.mjs",
    "scripts/strategy-navigation.test.mjs",
    "scripts/strategy-story.test.mjs",
    "scripts/verify.mjs",
    "scripts/browser/skills-stories.cjs",
    "scripts/browser/strategy-navigation.cjs",
    "scripts/browser/target-midpoints.cjs",
    "scripts/browser/roadmap-timeline.cjs"
  ],
  "scope": "Traceability is a review aid, not semantic approval or business evidence. All 30 routes remain in strategy-coverage.json; all 16 canonical contracts retain original checksums, 9 prototypes and 7 unimplemented. Reviewer must cold-read the actual pages and inspect complete exports."
}