docs: publish target AI adoption strategy and synthetic measurement examples

docs/strategy/roadmap.mdx

@@ -0,0 +1,54 @@
+---
+id: roadmap
+title: Roadmap
+description: Evidence-gated phases, no promised dates or budgets.
+---
+
+
+<div className="strategy-content">
+
+**TO-BE · Target operating model.** Introduction depends on the [roadmap gates](./roadmap.mdx); these pages do not describe installed controls or measured company results.
+
+### Foundation
+
+**Entry evidence** — Strategy scope accepted for planning; existing teams identified.
+
+**Work** — Inventory actual client hosts/builds, provider/data terms, repositories, authority, owners and event availability; select low-risk workflows and metric definitions.
+
+**Exit evidence and hold condition** — Named accountable people and independent reviewers, bounded pilot charter, forbidden actions, data/retention decision and reproducible baseline plan. Hold if accountability or lawful collection is unresolved.
+
+### Governed skills pilot
+
+**Entry evidence** — Foundation evidence approved; no privileged autonomous effects.
+
+**Work** — Build a small registry, immutable contract, client adapters, evaluations, coaching and synthetic measurement verification.
+
+**Exit evidence and hold condition** — Qualified client/skill tuples, mandatory safety checks, independent task acceptance, reconciled coverage and user feedback. Hold or narrow scope if quality or data coverage is inadequate.
+
+### Reliable distribution
+
+**Entry evidence** — Pilot quality and usefulness support continuing.
+
+**Work** — Canary updates, effective-version readback, version locking, exception expiry, stale/offline handling and rollback.
+
+**Exit evidence and hold condition** — Tested revocation and recovery, no bypass of central privileged gates, owners can support the catalog. Hold if effective versions or controls cannot be verified.
+
+### Logical SDLC coordination
+
+**Entry evidence** — Distribution, authority and measurement evidence stable.
+
+**Work** — Observe and assemble evidence first, then propose and route work within scoped identities and budgets.
+
+**Exit evidence and hold condition** — Exact-artifact approvals, idempotency, duplicate/outage recovery, separation of duties, audit and kill-switch drills pass; humans can take over. No authority expansion based on usage alone.
+
+### Departmental expansion
+
+**Entry evidence** — Each department supplies a workflow owner, outcome, data boundary and capacity.
+
+**Work** — Add Operations, Marketing, Finance & Accounting and HR & Administration workflows with domain-specific review; Product and Technology continue quality improvement.
+
+**Exit evidence and hold condition** — Departmental accepted outcomes, guardrails, total cost and experience justify continuation; sensitive decisions stay human. Stop or roll back workflows without adequate evidence.
+
+There are no invented launch dates, budgets, staffing commitments or guaranteed gains. Phase gates permit narrowing or stopping. Re-evaluate earlier phases when the underlying client, provider, data scope or authority changes.
+
+</div>